Another one of those things I have been meaning to do for ages, was to implement GeoRSS in the feed for edparsons.com. This has been more frustrating that I would have liked, but it now works.
Why the frustration, firstly there are three favours of GeoRSS, Simple and GML which you will find documented at the GeoRSS website and the so-called W3C Geo standard which for historic reasons is also widely used.
So I started initially using the GML encoding only to find there are very few readers which work with it, so OK back to the simple version and a little greater success.
So I guess we are still at the walking rather than running stage for GeoRSS, buts its great to see the major traditional GIS vendors as well as GYM beginning to adopt this approach.
This has value way beyond blogging and putting pins on web maps however, I think there is great potential for GML encoded GeoRSS to offer a realistic alternative to the Web Feature Server as a mechanism for supplying changed feature data in a change only update service.
To learn more watch the GeoRSS blog and all credit to Mikel for his GeoRSS google map plug-in which was used to produce the map above.
7 replies on “edparsons.com.. now with added GeoRSS”
Cool. I’m messing with adding GeoRSS feeds on my GPS site. here is your feed overlayed on my site
Good work Ed. Did you use the georss.org WordPress plugin for both ingest of coordinates as well as mapping them? Or did you roll your own? I orginally rolled my own, until I found out about the georss.org work, which I’ll be migrating to shortly.
Did not know about your plugin – would have saved me some trouble, I hacked together something based on the Geo plugin.
Very cool thanks
Try this: http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/#1546974
[…] for Ed Parsons (chief technology officer of Ordnance Survey) who pointed it out on his blog. He asks there: The imagery seems to leapfrog the imagery in google earth/maps seeming to be more […]
[…] pictures from getmapping.Thanks for Ed Parsons (chief technology officer of Ordnance Survey) who pointed it out on his blog. He asks there:The imagery seems to leapfrog the imagery in google earth/maps seeming to be more […]