The past couple of months seems to have offered a cathartic opportunity for the relatively small UK Geographic Information Industry to get some long terms issues off its collective chest.
In no particular order we have seen the following public responses to the Consultation for the future of Ordnance Survey. (Let me know if you know of any more.. updated – thanks for all the links, keep them coming)
- Local Government Association Group
- Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information
- Locus Association
- Tom Hughes
- Association for Geographic Information
- Free our Data Campaign
- OSGeo UK chapter and the Open Knowledge Foundation Network
- Andy Robinson
- Simon Brooke
- The Ramblers
- Christopher Roper
- The NHS Information Centre
- Leeds City Council
- Will Abson
- British Cartographic Society
- Bob Barr
All these responses share a common opinion that the status-quo or Ordnance Survey’s own strategy (remember that?) for it’s future is not acceptable.
In many cases the responses quite rightly identify the issue as something wider than just should OS make some data free, but what is the UK strategy for the use of Geographic Information in general.
This strategic view is something which has never been defined clearly, but is something OS has unfortunately tried to remain gatekeeper for, as it’s Director General is advisor to Government on all things geographical.
The consultation understandably and in my mind quite rightly has remained focused on the specifics of making OS data free, and in the great tradition of Civil Service options papers offers a Goldilocks Choice; one too cold, one too hot and one option just about acceptable.
Option 1 appears to maintain the status-quo and I don’t see anyone outside the Romsey Road distortion field supporting it.
Option 2 is perhaps something that may be achievable in the long term with continued technological change and changing market requirements, however at the moment this would put Ordnance Survey in a position where it’s current operational processes are financially unsustainable.
So Option 3 represents the obvious compromise, some small scale data for free while allowing the cash cow of MasterMap to continue to fund a reduced but largely similar OS to the one we have today.
There are of course two rather large Elephants in the room, one of which appears to have been put into the “too difficult” bucket and the other is not mentioned perhaps because by making data free the issue will disappear ?
Postal Geography, the fact there is no single address register which can be used without major limitations is a national embarrassment, for a knowledge economy this is the equivalent of trying to run railways before a single standard time was introduced. This is an issue bigger than Ordnance Survey, although OS has had it’s part to play in the current mess, this really does need strategic leadership from the centre.
Derived Data, OS must stop its current practice of claiming intellectual property rights to any geospatial product created with even passing reference to Ordnance Survey products as “derived” information. There is no direct mention of this is the consultation, and if OS data is made available using a CC-BY license then this may not be an issue, but I would really like to see this clarified.
I just can’t help thinking however them is a dreamlike / fairy tale element to this process, Goldilocks aside. The consultation process ends today, and Government will probably shut down and enter Purdah in 2 weeks, I just hope we don’t wake up after the election and find the whole process was a dream and the new administration has much bigger issues to deal with.
Written and submitted from home (51.425N, 0.331W)
21 replies on “OS Consultation; a fairy tale ?”
[…] officer of Ordnance Survey but now at Google, has blogged about the OS consultation, which he describes as a fairy tale: The consultation understandably and in my mind quite rightly has remained focused on the specifics […]