<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A change of direction for the OS ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Wishart</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-153164</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Wishart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=627#comment-153164</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

It does all seems to be coming to a head... but I believe that the statement in the PBR is just a restatement of what was in the original terms of reference for the trading fund review (http://www.shareholderexecutive.gov.uk/publications/pdf/tradingfunds250608terms.pdf).

I was anticipating something in the PBR itself...but I&#039;m hoping that the delay is due to a recognition that the policy makers needs to get this one right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>It does all seems to be coming to a head&#8230; but I believe that the statement in the PBR is just a restatement of what was in the original terms of reference for the trading fund review (<a href="http://www.shareholderexecutive.gov.uk/publications/pdf/tradingfunds250608terms.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.shareholderexecutive.gov.uk/publications/pdf/tradingfunds250608terms.pdf</a>).</p>
<p>I was anticipating something in the PBR itself&#8230;but I&#8217;m hoping that the delay is due to a recognition that the policy makers needs to get this one right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cartmell</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-153161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cartmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=627#comment-153161</guid>
		<description>This sounds like the pressure from the Show us a Better Way competition winners, and the requirement for online crime mapping, are starting to have an effect. Plus, of course, the many small online mapping applications that are springing up to benefit UK people (mainly thanks to Google&#039;s excellent Maps API) such as http://www.fillthathole.org.uk :)

If this means that the budget will remove some of the licence restrictions on geospatial information in the UK then it must be Good News for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like the pressure from the Show us a Better Way competition winners, and the requirement for online crime mapping, are starting to have an effect. Plus, of course, the many small online mapping applications that are springing up to benefit UK people (mainly thanks to Google&#8217;s excellent Maps API) such as <a href="http://www.fillthathole.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.fillthathole.org.uk</a> <img src='http://www.edparsons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If this means that the budget will remove some of the licence restrictions on geospatial information in the UK then it must be Good News for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-153160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=627#comment-153160</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin,

This is not about privatisation-  this is about how the OS trades.. how it charges for data, and its relationship with other departments. This has been on the cards for a while, although I think the issue with derived data no doubt moved this up the agenda a bit !

The privatisation stories from yesterday seem to be just speculation.

ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin,</p>
<p>This is not about privatisation-  this is about how the OS trades.. how it charges for data, and its relationship with other departments. This has been on the cards for a while, although I think the issue with derived data no doubt moved this up the agenda a bit !</p>
<p>The privatisation stories from yesterday seem to be just speculation.</p>
<p>ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/11/a-change-of-direction-for-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-153159</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=627#comment-153159</guid>
		<description>This is one of the more interesting reactions: http://www.freeourdata.org.uk/blog/?p=266</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the more interesting reactions: <a href="http://www.freeourdata.org.uk/blog/?p=266" rel="nofollow">http://www.freeourdata.org.uk/blog/?p=266</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
