<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GSDI 10 &#8211; Despite best intentions, slow progress but a new outlook ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/</link>
	<description>The blog of Ed Parsons, Geographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sliwinski</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sliwinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=639#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>Technology changes. What news! ;-) But the past and current pace of change seems to fuel a never ending process inside many SDI projects. Instead of adapting a growing set of evolutionarily developed SDI components to be in line with stable technological inventions, it seems to me that the Grand Designeurs decided to take a one huge step by specifying everything in all possible detail before implementation and deployment can start. Some tiny prototypes here and there are of course possible and desirable. But I fear that they will do so as long as there is a risk that the produced documents may eventually become obsolete because of innovation. If this is true, than one is sure as hell: An operational SDI will start to emerge when technology stops to change. Dont know when this will happen... Maybe the expected recession will give the technology industry a chance to stop changing? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology changes. What news! <img src='http://blakeparsons.com/edparsons/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  But the past and current pace of change seems to fuel a never ending process inside many SDI projects. Instead of adapting a growing set of evolutionarily developed SDI components to be in line with stable technological inventions, it seems to me that the Grand Designeurs decided to take a one huge step by specifying everything in all possible detail before implementation and deployment can start. Some tiny prototypes here and there are of course possible and desirable. But I fear that they will do so as long as there is a risk that the produced documents may eventually become obsolete because of innovation. If this is true, than one is sure as hell: An operational SDI will start to emerge when technology stops to change. Dont know when this will happen&#8230; Maybe the expected recession will give the technology industry a chance to stop changing? <img src='http://blakeparsons.com/edparsons/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=639#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

&quot;an almost impossible design choice&quot; is any technology that will be implemented in 10 years time...

As to REST vs SOAP, I think I agree with you in seeing the benefits of REST, however the mainstream GI is still focused on the &quot;new&quot; technology of SOAP based web services, and  are  mostly unfamiliar with REST.. still this will hopefully change with the next release of ArcGIS..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>&#8220;an almost impossible design choice&#8221; is any technology that will be implemented in 10 years time&#8230;</p>
<p>As to REST vs SOAP, I think I agree with you in seeing the benefits of REST, however the mainstream GI is still focused on the &#8220;new&#8221; technology of SOAP based web services, and  are  mostly unfamiliar with REST.. still this will hopefully change with the next release of ArcGIS..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gillies</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=639#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;For technical architects this is an almost impossible design choice.&quot;

Ed, do you mean the choice between REST and SOAP? That&#039;s pretty clear since the strengths and weaknesses of each are well known and there&#039;s at least one exemplar of a RESTful architecture: the Web. Or are you writing there about a different choice?

Also, I have a little footnote to this post at http://zcologia.com/news/699/rethinking-gsdi-architecture/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;For technical architects this is an almost impossible design choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ed, do you mean the choice between REST and SOAP? That&#8217;s pretty clear since the strengths and weaknesses of each are well known and there&#8217;s at least one exemplar of a RESTful architecture: the Web. Or are you writing there about a different choice?</p>
<p>Also, I have a little footnote to this post at <a href="http://zcologia.com/news/699/rethinking-gsdi-architecture/" rel="nofollow">http://zcologia.com/news/699/rethinking-gsdi-architecture/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2008/03/gsdi-10-despite-best-intentions-slow-progress-but-new-a-new-outlook/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=639#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>As we are finding so clearly, bottom-up gets further than top-down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we are finding so clearly, bottom-up gets further than top-down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

