<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eisenstein at a GIS conference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edparsons.com/2006/09/eisenstein-at-a-gis-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2006/09/eisenstein-at-a-gis-conference/</link>
	<description>The blog of Ed Parsons, Geographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Woolford</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2006/09/eisenstein-at-a-gis-conference/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Woolford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=334#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed
I agree, the issue with image tagging is it can be so subjective. Another approach could be to tag the image with OS co-ords or even TOID&#039;s so that there is some degree of commonality between our images and other databases, but again this looks like a big manual task! To start with we planning to do some basic content tagging such as Pub-Coach and Horses, Station-Warren Street, Shop-Fred etc and then develop from there. In reality I think our images sit somewhere in the middle between massively structured datasets such as OS mastermap and &#039;wisdom of crowds&#039; type tagging at the other extreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed<br />
I agree, the issue with image tagging is it can be so subjective. Another approach could be to tag the image with OS co-ords or even TOID&#8217;s so that there is some degree of commonality between our images and other databases, but again this looks like a big manual task! To start with we planning to do some basic content tagging such as Pub-Coach and Horses, Station-Warren Street, Shop-Fred etc and then develop from there. In reality I think our images sit somewhere in the middle between massively structured datasets such as OS mastermap and &#8216;wisdom of crowds&#8217; type tagging at the other extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2006/09/eisenstein-at-a-gis-conference/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=334#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,

Interesting point, I&#039;m not sure that a completely people driven tagging system actually works as your example image illustrates, it could be, a shopping street, a shopping street in london, an up market shopping street in london, new bond street or just Fred the jewellers..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>Interesting point, I&#8217;m not sure that a completely people driven tagging system actually works as your example image illustrates, it could be, a shopping street, a shopping street in london, an up market shopping street in london, new bond street or just Fred the jewellers..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Woolford</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2006/09/eisenstein-at-a-gis-conference/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Woolford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=334#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed

Just wanted to thank Ordnance Survey for an excellent event, certainly a lot of &#039;food for thought&#039;.

In the context of the &#039;semantic web&#039; we should also consider how digital images are handled. While tagging images is popular (flickr etc) there is relatively little structure. Do you take the &#039;wisdom of crowds&#039; approach (similar to flickr) or attempt to impose a struture for tagging images. Having location (along with date/time) is a start, but tagging the content of an image is a real challenge for example in what way could I tag this image: http://www.trekwireless.co.uk/posipix/B20050820_031_0223.jpg so that relevant OS data could be integrated with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed</p>
<p>Just wanted to thank Ordnance Survey for an excellent event, certainly a lot of &#8216;food for thought&#8217;.</p>
<p>In the context of the &#8216;semantic web&#8217; we should also consider how digital images are handled. While tagging images is popular (flickr etc) there is relatively little structure. Do you take the &#8216;wisdom of crowds&#8217; approach (similar to flickr) or attempt to impose a struture for tagging images. Having location (along with date/time) is a start, but tagging the content of an image is a real challenge for example in what way could I tag this image: <a href="http://www.trekwireless.co.uk/posipix/B20050820_031_0223.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.trekwireless.co.uk/posipix/B20050820_031_0223.jpg</a> so that relevant OS data could be integrated with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

