<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terrafuture featured on the Very Spatial Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Lorant,

Happy to comment.. the auto-google thing I guess is a reflection of the view of some people that Google is &#039;trying to take over the world&quot; and when you get down to if google&#039;s motive is to increasing it&#039;s advertising revenue. I personally don&#039;t have any problem with this whatsoever - but some people I think saw google mistakenly as a source of &#039;free data&quot;.

I can&#039;t wait to see what happens next.. Google has had such a positive impact on the GI industry it will be interesting to see how the &quot;old guard&quot; respond.

ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorant,</p>
<p>Happy to comment.. the auto-google thing I guess is a reflection of the view of some people that Google is &#8216;trying to take over the world&#8221; and when you get down to if google&#8217;s motive is to increasing it&#8217;s advertising revenue. I personally don&#8217;t have any problem with this whatsoever &#8211; but some people I think saw google mistakenly as a source of &#8216;free data&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see what happens next.. Google has had such a positive impact on the GI industry it will be interesting to see how the &#8220;old guard&#8221; respond.</p>
<p>ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorant Czaran</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorant Czaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment from Warsaw!
I would have preferred if Ed ellaborated on the &quot;building anti-google sentiment&quot; a bit, as I am not aware of such... Except the anti-sentiment generated by &quot;enemies of the open skies&quot;, but I might not know it all...
Also, I read that Google is also having a WMS-enabled new client, and WFS could come soon. I am not saying they were not late in going &quot;open&quot;, we have repeatedly asked for that too, but maybe this will help in having Google also more &quot;open standards oriented&quot; in the future...
But let&#039;s see what this new ESRI product will offer... I wonder why all well-paying ESRI customers are not already be beta-testing it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment from Warsaw!<br />
I would have preferred if Ed ellaborated on the &#8220;building anti-google sentiment&#8221; a bit, as I am not aware of such&#8230; Except the anti-sentiment generated by &#8220;enemies of the open skies&#8221;, but I might not know it all&#8230;<br />
Also, I read that Google is also having a WMS-enabled new client, and WFS could come soon. I am not saying they were not late in going &#8220;open&#8221;, we have repeatedly asked for that too, but maybe this will help in having Google also more &#8220;open standards oriented&#8221; in the future&#8230;<br />
But let&#8217;s see what this new ESRI product will offer&#8230; I wonder why all well-paying ESRI customers are not already be beta-testing it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Very Spatial &#187; ArcGIS Explorer round-up</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Very Spatial &#187; ArcGIS Explorer round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>[...] d the below are some of the discussion on this announement. 	GISMatters From Fantom Planet EdParsons SpatiallyAdjusted SpatiallyAdjusted2 OgleEarth 	 	 	 	      No comments for ArcGIS Explorer roun [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] d the below are some of the discussion on this announement. 	GISMatters From Fantom Planet EdParsons SpatiallyAdjusted SpatiallyAdjusted2 OgleEarth 	</p>
<p>   No comments for ArcGIS Explorer roun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geared Up Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Google Earth Killer?</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Geared Up Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Google Earth Killer?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-969</guid>
		<description>[...] this one last one&#8230; 	There&#8217;s talk on a number of blogs about the upcoming release of ERSI&#8217;s GOOGLE EARTH KILLER! haha&#8230;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this one last one&#8230; 	There&#8217;s talk on a number of blogs about the upcoming release of ERSI&#8217;s GOOGLE EARTH KILLER! haha&#8230;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Earth Weblog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; ArcGIS Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Earth Weblog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; ArcGIS Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-917</guid>
		<description>[...] ts WFS out-of-the-box, but ArcGIS Desktop doesn&#8217;t?) 	How open is it? 	Is it a &#8220;Google Earth killer&#8220;. 	The business model. 	 Posted by: Andrew Hallam, metaspatial [at] gmail [dot] com 	 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ts WFS out-of-the-box, but ArcGIS Desktop doesn&#8217;t?) 	How open is it? 	Is it a &#8220;Google Earth killer&#8220;. 	The business model. 	 Posted by: Andrew Hallam, metaspatial [at] gmail [dot] com</p>
<p> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Cope's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.edparsons.com/2005/11/terrafuture-featured-on-the-very-spatial-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Cope's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edparsons.com/?p=124#comment-893</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ESRI&#039;s &quot;Google Killing&quot; ArcExplorer 2.0&lt;/strong&gt;

ESRI has released ArcExplorer 2.0. It&#039;s claimed by some to be a &quot;Google Earth&quot; killer. It&#039;s not surprising that ESRI has a response to GE, and that it didn&#039;t take them long to do so! An interesting note though... ArcExplorer 2.0 reads, among lots ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ESRI&#8217;s &#8220;Google Killing&#8221; ArcExplorer 2.0</strong></p>
<p>ESRI has released ArcExplorer 2.0. It&#8217;s claimed by some to be a &#8220;Google Earth&#8221; killer. It&#8217;s not surprising that ESRI has a response to GE, and that it didn&#8217;t take them long to do so! An interesting note though&#8230; ArcExplorer 2.0 reads, among lots &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
